top of page

PROJECT: MEDIATION - AN ALTERNATIVE PATH TO RESOLVING DISPUTES

  • Aug 25
  • 8 min read

PLEASE SHARE THIS PUBLIC DOCUMENT

Conflict is an unavoidable part of society.

Disputes may arise between family members, business partners, employers and employees, neighbours,

consumers and service providers, or parties involved in civil and commercial matters.

While many disputes ultimately end up in court, litigation is not always the most efficient,

affordable or appropriate method of resolving a disagreement.


Mediation provides an alternative dispute-resolution mechanism in which an independent and impartial mediator

assists the parties in attempting to reach a mutually acceptable agreement.

The mediator does not decide who is right or wrong and does not impose a judgment.

Instead, the mediator facilitates communication and assists the parties in identifying possible solutions.

For South Africans, mediation can provide an important mechanism for resolving disputes

without immediately resorting to expensive and often protracted litigation.

WHAT IS MEDIATION?

  • Mediation is a structured process in which an independent third party, known as a mediator, assists disputing parties to communicate, identify the issues in dispute and negotiate a possible settlement.

  • The mediator is not a judge, arbitrator or investigator.

  • The mediator generally does not determine the facts of the dispute or impose a decision upon the parties.

  • The fundamental principle is that the parties retain control over the outcome.

  • A successful mediation normally ends with the parties reaching an agreement setting out what has been decided and what each party is required to do.

  • Depending on the circumstances and the applicable legal framework, a mediated settlement may have legal consequences and can, in appropriate circumstances, be made an order of court.

MEDIATION IS NOT THE SAME AS ARBITRATION:

  • Mediation and arbitration are sometimes confused.

  • In mediation, the mediator facilitates negotiations and the parties decide whether they will settle and on what terms.

  • In arbitration, an arbitrator hears the parties' respective cases and decides or awards, subject to the terms of the arbitration agreement and applicable law.

  • Mediation is therefore generally more collaborative, whereas arbitration is more adjudicative.

HOW DOES MEDIATION WORK?

  • Although procedures differ depending on the nature of the dispute and the mediator involved, mediation commonly follows several stages.

  • The parties first agree to participate in the process, either voluntarily or because a contract, court process or other applicable arrangement provides for mediation.

  • The mediator explains the process and establishes the ground rules.

  • Each party is then given an opportunity to explain its position and identify the issues it believes need to be resolved.

  • The mediator may subsequently hold joint discussions and, where appropriate, private sessions with individual parties.

  • These private discussions are often referred to as caucuses.

  • The mediator attempts to move the parties away from entrenched positions and towards identifying their underlying interests and practical solutions.

  • If agreement is reached, the settlement should be properly recorded.

  • Parties should understand exactly what they are agreeing to before signing a settlement agreement.

THE IMPORTANCE OF AN INDEPENDENT MEDIATOR:

  • The credibility of mediation depends heavily upon the neutrality and competence of the mediator.

  • A mediator should not favour one party over another.

  • The mediator must be capable of managing conflict, maintaining confidentiality within the limits applicable to the process and ensuring that each party has a meaningful opportunity to participate.

  • A mediator is also not a substitute for a lawyer. Where the dispute involves substantial financial, contractual, property, family or other legal consequences, parties should consider obtaining independent legal advice before entering into a binding settlement.

ADVANTAGES OF MEDIATION:

  • One of the principal advantages of mediation is speed.

  • Court proceedings can take considerable time, while an appropriate dispute may sometimes be resolved through mediation in substantially less time.

  • Mediation may also be less expensive than litigation, although there is no guarantee that it will be inexpensive.

  • Another important advantage is confidentiality.

  • Unlike court proceedings, which generally take place within a public judicial system, mediation is normally conducted privately, subject to the applicable rules and legal requirements.

  • Mediation can also preserve relationships.

  • This is particularly important where the parties must continue dealing with one another after the dispute, such as business partners, employers and employees, neighbours or family members.

  • Most importantly, mediation allows the parties to develop a solution that a court might not necessarily be able to provide.

THE LIMITATIONS OF MEDIATION:

  • Mediation is not suitable for every dispute.

  • A mediation process can only work effectively where the parties are capable of participating meaningfully and there is sufficient willingness to negotiate.

  • Mediation can also be inappropriate where there is a significant imbalance of power, intimidation, coercion or a serious risk to the safety of one of the participants.

  • This is particularly important in disputes involving domestic violence, coercive control, serious abuse or threats of violence.

  • A victim should not be pressured into mediation merely because it appears to be a quicker or cheaper alternative to litigation.

  • Mediation must never become a mechanism through which an alleged perpetrator obtains access to, intimidates or manipulates a victim.

MEDIATION AND CRIMINAL MATTERS:

  • The public should also understand that mediation does not simply replace criminal justice.

  • Where a person is suspected of committing a serious criminal offence, the matter may require investigation by the South African Police Service and consideration by the National Prosecuting Authority.

  • A private settlement between individuals does not automatically extinguish criminal liability.

  • This distinction is critical.

  • A dispute involving an unpaid debt or contractual disagreement may potentially be appropriate for mediation, whereas allegations involving serious violence, sexual offences, kidnapping, extortion, serious fraud or other criminal conduct must require formal investigation and prosecution.

MEDIATION IN BUSINESS DISPUTES:

  • Mediation can be particularly useful in commercial disputes.

  • Businesses may become involved in disagreements concerning contracts, payments, construction projects, employment relationships, partnerships, services, suppliers or professional relationships.

  • Litigation can be costly and can damage commercial relationships.

  • Mediation gives the parties an opportunity to find a commercially practical solution while potentially preserving the underlying relationship.

  • For this reason, businesses should consider incorporating appropriate dispute-resolution clauses into contracts before disputes arise.

MEDIATION AND THE SOUTH AFRICAN LEGAL SYSTEM:

  • South Africa recognises alternative dispute resolution as an important means of resolving appropriate disputes.

  • The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996, establishes a legal system founded upon constitutional values, including access to justice.

  • Alternative dispute-resolution mechanisms such as mediation can contribute to that objective by providing parties with another avenue through which disputes may be addressed.

  • However, mediation must operate within the law.

  • Parties should not assume that every mediated agreement is automatically enforceable in precisely the same manner as a court order.

  • The legal status and enforcement of a settlement depend upon the circumstances and applicable legal framework.

  • Where substantial rights or financial interests are involved, obtaining appropriate legal advice is essential.

MEDIATION AND THE PUBLIC:

  • Members of the public should not regard mediation as simply a way of "avoiding court".

  • The more important question is whether mediation is appropriate for the particular dispute.

  • Before entering mediation, parties should establish:

    • What exactly is being disputed?

    • What outcome is being sought?

    • Is the mediator genuinely independent?

    • Are both parties participating voluntarily and without improper pressure?

    • Is there any history of intimidation, abuse or threats?

    • Are there legal rights that need to be protected?

    • Should independent legal advice be obtained?

    • What will happen if no settlement is reached?

  • These questions can prevent an inappropriate mediation process from causing further harm.

From a crime-prevention and investigative perspective, SSS emphasises that mediation should not be confused with an investigation.

Where allegations involve criminal conduct, evidence must be preserved and the appropriate authorities should be approached where necessary.

Mediation may assist in resolving a legitimate dispute, but it should never be used to suppress evidence, intimidate complainants,

conceal criminal conduct or prevent victims from exercising their legal rights.

In cases involving suspected fraud, extortion, threats, abuse, kidnapping, sexual offences or other serious crimes,

professional advice and appropriate law-enforcement intervention should be considered before any settlement process is pursued.


Mediation can be a powerful and practical method of resolving disputes.

It can save time, reduce costs, protect relationships and give parties greater control over the eventual outcome.

However, mediation is not a universal solution. It works best when the dispute is appropriate for negotiation,

the parties can participate freely and the mediator is independent and competent.


The public must also understand the distinction between a civil dispute and a criminal offence.

A settlement cannot simply be used as a mechanism to make serious criminal allegations disappear.

The fundamental principle is therefore simple: mediation should be used to resolve appropriate disputes,

not to undermine justice.


SSS encourages members of the public who are confronted with complex disputes, suspected criminal conduct,

intimidation, fraud or other serious matters to obtain appropriate professional and legal advice

before signing agreements or entering into settlement negotiations.

Early and informed action can often prevent a dispute from developing into a far more serious problem.

Contact Mr. Mike Bolhuis, who has extensive experience in mediation and the legal aspects surrounding dispute resolution.

Specialised Security Services invites the public to the Mike Bolhuis Daily Projects WhatsApp Channel.

This channel is important in delivering insights into the latest crime trends, awareness, warnings and the exposure of criminals.


How to Join the WhatsApp Channel:

1. Make sure you have the latest version of WhatsApp on your device.

2. Click on the link below to join the Mike Bolhuis Daily Projects WhatsApp Channel:

3. Follow the prompts to join the channel.

4. Make sure you click on "Follow", then click on the "bell"-icon (🔔)

CONTACT MR MIKE BOLHUIS FOR SAFETY AND SECURITY MEASURES, PROTECTION, OR AN INVESTIGATION IF NEEDED.

ALL INFORMATION RECEIVED WILL BE TREATED IN THE STRICTEST CONFIDENTIALITY AND EVERY IDENTITY WILL BE PROTECTED.

Regards,

Mike Bolhuis

Specialist Investigators into

Serious Violent, Serious Economic Crimes & Serious Cybercrimes

PSIRA Reg. 1590364/421949

Mobile: +27 82 447 6116

Fax: 086 585 4924

Follow us on Facebook to view our projects -


EXTREMELY IMPORTANT: All potential clients need to be aware that owing to the nature of our work as specialist investigators there are people who have been caught on the wrong side of the law - who are trying to discredit me - Mike Bolhuis and my organisation Specialised Security Services - to get themselves off the hook. This retaliation happens on social media and creates doubt about our integrity and ability. Doubt created on social media platforms is both unwarranted and untrue. We strongly recommend that you make up your minds concerning me and our organisation only after considering all the factual information - to the exclusion of hearsay and assumptions. Furthermore, you are welcome to address your concerns directly with me should you still be unsatisfied with your conclusions. While the internet provides a lot of valuable information, it is also a platform that distributes a lot of false information. The distribution of false information, fake news, slander and hate speech constitutes a crime that can be prosecuted by law. Your own research discretion and discernment are imperative when choosing what and what not to believe.


STANDARD RULES APPLY: Upon appointment, we require a formal mandate with detailed instructions. Please take note that should you not make use of our services – you may not under any circumstance use my name or the name of my organisation as a means to achieve whatever end.


POPI ACT 4 of 2013 South Africa: Mike Bolhuis' "Specialised Security Services" falls under Section 6 of the act. Read more here: https://mikebh.link/fntdpv

SSS TASK TEAM:

Copyright © 2015- PRESENT | Mike Bolhuis Specialised Security Services | All rights reserved.


Our mailing address is:

Mike Bolhuis Specialised Security Services

PO Box 15075 Lynn East

Pretoria, Gauteng 0039

South Africa

Add us to your address book


THIS PUBLIC DOCUMENT WAS INTENDED TO BE SHARED, PLEASE DO SO.

CONTACT US

Pretoria, 75 Wapad, Leeuwfontein Estate, Roodeplaat, 0186, South Africa

​​

E-mail: mike@mikebolhuis.co.za
Mobile: 082 447  6116
International: +27 82
447 6116
Fax: 086 585 4924

  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • YouTube
  • TikTok
chat with mike bolhuis on whatsapp

Thanks for submitting!

Copyright © mikebolhuis.co.za

MLB DIENSTE CC Reg: 1995/036819/23

PSIRA Reg: 1590364/421949

Web design by Mike Bolhuis Cybercrime Unit

bottom of page